Monthly Archives: October 2008

The Socialist Under The Bed

I think I have just about had my fill of this stupid socialism cry from the McCain/Palin camp. It is ridiculous to continue the old McCarthyism mantra of there is a communist hiding in the closet. Yet now it is a socialist under the bed. The hypocrisy is that Palin herself has implemented these very same ideas in Alaska and McCain has endorsed this idea as well.

They believe that it is socialism to give tax cuts to the middle class while repealing the large tax cuts for the wealthy. Hmmm, let me get this straight it is bad to give tax cuts to the middle class and good to give tax cuts to the wealthiest people and companies. Ok, I get it now. So, McCain continuing the tax cuts of Bush are somehow going to build jobs.

It is obvious that the McCain Palin ticket is extremely desperate to continue these lies. What about their supporters? Are they that stupid or that blind that they would rather see tax cuts go to the wealthiest people because…Somehow this will help them in the long run, when they are already hurting for money and can barely pay rent, mortgage or buy food and gas. Right, that sounds like a stupid plan endorsed by a bunch of stupid people who don’t have the good sense to have self preservation.

Yet, these same fools will agree how great it is that Palin herself redistributed the wealth in Alaska. She took wealth from the oil companies and distributed it to those who had less wealth. By cutting a twelve hundred dollar check to each and every Alaskan. And this is not socialism why?

McCain can cluck about making the Bush tax cuts permanent which were to take from the middle class and give it to those making over two hundred and fifty thousand dollars. So I guess according to McCain or Palin socialism is only when it is money going from rich to poor or that at least when it is done by Obama. I get it.

It seems to me that McCain’s straight talk express just lost ANOTHER wheel. I don’t know if this guy even has any wheels left on that bus. I think he is rolling on rims like one of those fools running from the cops down a Los Angeles freeway. I am sure this wheel is probably the spare. Anyhow, this is just another diversion which shows that McCain has no clue how to run a campaign let alone this country. Why would anyone want to put all of our lives in the hands of a fool who can’t even run a half successful

11 Comments

Filed under Social Issues

The Straight Talk Express Has Lost Another Wheel

I guess the McCain Palin ticket is going down faster than McCain flying an A-4 Skyhawk. Since the news has been about some crazy McCain campaign volunteer named Ashley Todd went to the police swearing that a big “black” man (of course) robbed her then noticed her McCain/Palin bumper sticker, went crazy and carved a B for Barack into her face.

Now of course she couldn’t hold up the lie and now SHE is being charged with making false police reports. It should have been totally easy to spot that she was lying. Since how many dyslexic criminals are running around carving backwards letters into people after being set off by bumper stickers? Anyhow, she had this large black eye.

Now if I am not mistaken this is the same nonsense that has gotten thousands upon thousands of black men killed, lynched and falsely imprisoned. What do people think the cops were going to do if this nuts story had been the least bit credible? They were going to scour that place nabbing every big black guy, a bunch of scrawny black guys and everything in between so that white people would feel safe on the streets.

McCain’s camp being so eager to get anything even if it was something so sleazy and tawdry as this female bozo’s story to use as a Billy club to beat down the Obama surge in the polls. His campaign latched on to this probably through the Drudge Report since they are hoping for another blue dress to pop out of some fat white bimbo’s closet. But what they got was some fat white bimbo with a big B carved in her face, a big black eye and a story to end all campaign stories.

Now they are telling everyone that they had nothing to do with this story hitting the news before the cops had a chance to be investigate it. It seems like another female that the McCain team failed to fully vet before throwing her out for public scrutiny. Yet, we see that FOX News (if you want to call it that) didn’t waste any time getting this story on air without the slightest bit of journalistic investigation. Now you know you can’t read through all your laughing and I totally understand. Thinking that Fox News would actually do some journalistic investigation was totally my fault and I apologize.

Anyhow I am just wondering if McCain or Palin will now be combing the crowds looking for Ashley the cutter, or maybe they will call her Ashley the nut. I am sure they would like to sweep this under the rug seeing as both McCain and Palin wasted no time calling her and her family to express their sympathy over the terrible event and wish them well. Well I hope they don’t continue to say that their crazy campaign insinuations aren’t causing the crazies to come out of the woodwork.

Like they have been told for the last month or so, their campaign trail incitement could cause someone to do something stupid and here we go. People hopefully will see these two as the do anything; say anything, country dividing, race baiting haters that they are. It should be completely obvious to anyone who cares to look, that these two are completely inept at bringing this country together and helping to bring about change. We are already divided by race, religion, education and income isn’t it about time that we CHANGED that instead of continuing it for another four years?

6 Comments

Filed under Racism

Obama Gives Tax Cuts To Dummies


This hoopla that somehow jobs are created from the top down is ridiculous. By McCain continuing the same retarded tax cuts for the richest Americans while continuing to overtax the middle class will miraculously create jobs is crazy especially since it did not work before. And you don’t have to look any further than the last four years of the Bush tax cuts which were synonymous with tax cuts for the wealthy.

Last time I checked they didn’t create any jobs. And in fact we have lost jobs, a LOT of jobs and the economy is in a hole. So I guess McCain thinks that he and Palin will continue to do the same tax strategy of Bush’s from the last four years and this time hope and pray that it works.

McCain claims that by giving tax cuts to those at the top, jobs will just trickle down to the rest of us. Here is a little tidbit of information for him and all those who think this is true. Let’s use the lemonade stand as an example.  If you give a big tax cut to Mr. Lemonade stand owner he isn’t going to create any jobs he is probably going to put that money in his pocket and more than likely slash jobs.

Why? Because there is NO DEMAND for his product.  Because the people who buy lemonade, you know those middle class people who had a hike in their taxes so Mr. Lemonade stand owner could get a tax cut, don’t have any money.  They decide to hold on to their money because they have to pay bills and have less money to do so due to the fact they have high taxes.

If less middle class lemonade drinkers buy lemonade, Mr. Lemonade stand owner has less demand for his product. What does he do, he slashes jobs to save HIS money because he has bills to pay as well. So it is a vicious cycle where nobody prospers.  The business man has less money from lack of demand and the consumer has less money to demand anything.

Now if we go Obama’s route and cut taxes for the middle class by getting rid of those overzealous tax cuts for the wealthy or those making over two hundred and fifty thousand dollars we will make new jobs. Because those middle class lemonade drinkers will have more money in their pockets with lower taxes.  They now feel that they can afford to buy that lemonade. This will create a DEMAND for lemonade.  Thus the lemonade stand owner will need to get new employees in order to make sure he can fill all the orders for lemonade. Now we not only have more people employed we have more people out buying more goods and services.

So if John McCain and Sarah Palin would just put their tax strategy in the lemonade stand scenario they would also see that you can NOT grow jobs from the top to the bottom. Everything grows from the bottom up and that is the problem with how our government works now. They cater to those at the top when it is those at the bottom who are the key. People at the bottom drive the machine. Those at the top are hanging on for the ride.  When you have a LOT of people with money more goods and services are purchased.  Meaning more people will need to be employed and more money will be spent.  A GOOD vicious cycle.

So, I guess we should all think about what is important. To have more money in the hands of those who will drive the market by demanding more product which will in turn give more money to the business owners, making more jobs. Or give more money to those at the top to make more products even though there is no one who has extra money in order to demand those products.

UH DUH! I think we can all see where that leads. Just go and ask McCain’s economic buddy Carly Fiorina who ran Lucent pretty much into the ground right before trying to do the same to HP. Or let’s ask his other economic buddy who he would like to see replace Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Meg Whitman who saw her last two quarters at Ebay in a significant decline forcing the lay off of a bunch of people.

I guess we only need to look at who each candidate has as his advisors. And right now I can see why the McCain camp wants to continue a losing philosophy. And that doesn’t impress me right now. I am just amazed at the fact that you have so many people who are in the middle class who feel that they don’t deserve a tax cut, only those at the top do. Because they like it when the rich gets richer while we working class and poor get poorer.  And still Obama wants to give tax cuts and create jobs for dummies who would rather see themselves lose even more to those who aren’t hurting one bit.

4 Comments

Filed under Racism

McCain Is A Joke


Watching the debate last night I have to admit that this was the best of all the debates. It was engaging and comical. Now that being said, I want to ask people why we would want a comedian as our president. Is it just me or does McCain constantly think he has to be funny to get his point across? Aren’t we tired of being the joke of the world? We have a clown in office right now and we have a candidate running who not only identifies with that clown 90% of the time, but he wants to outdo that buffoon with his ultra buffoonery.

I don’t mind McClown showing that he is a colossal idiot. But how can people look at this man and see a serious presidential candidate who is actually prepared to run the country? I guess I just want a president who behaves and looks presidential as well as having a cool calm demeanor as well as having good ideas. We can not afford another village idiot running loose in the White House.

I totally understand that it isn’t about looks and who has a presidential presence. I am talking about a total package. The person that we choose needs to not only give the outward appearance of a president but also be able to make sound decisions, surround yourself with the best and brightest, also make decisions based on education not anger. We had two people on the stage and one looked like he was in control of the situation and able to lead. The other looked like he was about to turn green and burst out of his jacket in a fit of blind anger.

Now I have to agree with a lot of people who say that the way a person runs their campaign is a sure sign of how they would run the country. Richard Nixon ran a shady campaign and then started running an equally shady government. McCain is running a campaign that is erratic at best, full of hypocrisy, anger and hate. Obama on the other hand seems to be running a campaign that has kept sight of his goals, keeping out of the gutter and being tough while civil.

People are talking about Obama doing a lot of smiling and I don’t think he could help it. I was out and out laughing as I listened to McCain grappling with his attacks and continuing Bush’s policy of “say it enough times and everyone will believe it.” It just doesn’t work anymore. People were duped by that game then and Bush is wildly unpopular and trying to capitalize off of anything that he did is only making McCain look clumsy and desperate.

I hear a lot of people stating how afraid they would be if Obama got into office. Yet we should all fear a McClown presidency. He has a real problem controlling his anger which in the past has led him to have outbursts of profanity which was leveled at fellow senators. We saw a touch of that last night with all the eye rolling, huffing and puffing and interruptions that McCain couldn’t control. If that weren’t bad enough he can’t seem to stop hopping around like a frog on steroids. He has one stance which doesn’t seem to do much for the poll numbers and then he comes out with something new. He does this over and over again and makes himself look flighty.

So my take on this whole presidential race and all three debates is that Obama has handled himself in the same straightforward manner throughout and McCain has handled himself in the same erratic behavior as he has always shown. I am sure that this is biased since McCain just gives a person too many opportunities to point out the problems. Not only are his politics a lot like Bush’s but his buffoonish behavior is as well. We can not afford another minute of our country being run by our proverbial village idiot.

10 Comments

Filed under Racism

McCain: A Day Late And A Dollar Short, Again

People all over the news and the blogosphere are saying that McCain finally gets it and is trying to calm his hateful and equally pathetic supporters down. Those same pathetic losers he now calls his supporters then booed him for his troubles. Now my whole problem with this is that I won’t give him the benefit of the doubt that he actually “woke” up to the problem or “got it.”

I am personally going with the thought that he only decided to change his tune after seeing the polls drop further and the backlash he and Harpy started getting in the press. He didn’t just decide that these people went too far. If he felt that way, he would have corralled the crowd when they first started yelling that Obama should be killed, he’s a Muslim or Arab and he is a terrorist. I mean they the ones that told all those people that Obama indeed hangs or “palls” around with terrorists and that you don’t “really” know him. What in the world did McCain think was going to happen?

This seems to be a continuous mode of operation for McCain to be a day late and a dollar short. He thought the war in Iraq would be quick, and then had to admit that it obviously wasn’t going to be. He thought the economy was strong, and then had to admit that it wasn’t and we were in a crisis. He thought attempting to suspend the debate to go to Washington AFTER the negotiations were underway would fix the problem. And then had to admit it didn’t help but hindered the process so he took his butt to the debate after all. And now he thought that inciting an angry mob like ruckus with lies at his campaign rallies was a good idea and finally has to admit that it was a very, very bad idea.

It seems that he is constantly making stupid or bad decisions only to regret them all the while trying to act as if he is the candidate with impeccable decision making skills. When are all the people going to wake up and start asking if we are ALL going to have to pay for his incompetence if he is elected? He has yet to make a credible or decent decision while campaigning. Being so consistently wrong and backwards seems to be one of his new campaign promises, and one that he is keeping.

All I see in this man is an angry unhinged person who is willing to try to do any and everything to get to his goal. I think we saw months ago that Obama told us that McCain and company would start trying to make us afraid of him pointing out he was different and he was blasted as trying to play the race card at that time. And now that it has come to pass people need to wake up and realize that those people at the McSimple and Harpy rallies are just passengers on the Titanic and they ain’t on the upper decks. Can anyone say steerage?

McCain has come out with ads saying that Obama is dangerous and we “don’t really” know him, he doesn’t see America like “we” do, he palls around with terrorists, have people who introduce you call out Barack “HUSEIN” Obama which incites fears of Obama being Muslim, then act as if you don’t know why Ima Dingbat and Jack Stupid start saying that Obama is a terrorist, should be killed or he is an A-Rab.

He has surrounded himself with the most asinine out of touch incompetent people he could find and to me that speaks volumes of how he will run his administration. Not to mention that these so called advisors should not be able to do things that he doesn’t want them to do. So he can’t very well say that his advisors made all these decisions and he was just along for the ride. Wouldn’t that also show he has no leadership skills and is in fact a patsy for allowing his advisors to run his campaign ship into an iceberg? He has ruined what little bit of good reputation he had at one time.

Now we see that his desperation has gotten him into the worst of situations. Underestimating his opposition as he did with Iraq he is now making a last ditch effort in a fight he can’t seem to win. I guess he felt that the American people would welcome him as a liberator from the past eight horrible years and that he would easily have our hearts and minds. Plus his anger surge has failed as well. Unfortunately, he has been left clueless yet again by these failures and is trying to reorganize his campaign a day late and dollar short.

3 Comments

Filed under Racism

McCain The Cowardly Candidate

Am I the only one who doesn’t quite care that McCain referred to Obama as “that one?” Yes it was incredibly condescending and stupid. But right now I guess I am too focused on the fact that McCain is obviously a transparent coward. He has been attacking Obama all week long, calling him a terrorist not to mention allowing that harpy he calls a VP pick to do it for him. McCain had plenty of time during the back and forth that was going on to get in a little quip about how “none of us ‘really’ know Obama.”

Yet he totally squandered the chance to point to Obama’s face and call him out as that mysterious other. But alas the only thing that could come out of his impotent mouth was “that one.” Where the hell was that nonconformist, that rebel, that one of a kind Washington maverick that he has been trying so hard to sell to us voters or what he and Palin endearingly call us, poor suckers.

So instead of confronting the person he feels is an ill vetted terrorist or pal of terrorists himself, he does it behind Obama’s back along with his idiotic harpy. With her small mind values, oops small town values saying to the country, “I’ll fool you up real good like.” But what else could you possibly expect from a bunch of desperate clowns. I mean he did say that he “I intend to wage this campaign and to govern this country in a way that they would be proud of me,” … McCain also said that if elected, he would attempt to govern in the same spirit…

He claimed that “negative ads were like pornography, you know them when you see them.” He also said, “I just have to rely on the good judgment of the voters not to buy into these negative attack ads. Sooner or later they are going to figure out that if all you ever run are negative attack ads, you don’t have very much vision for the future or you don’t know how to articulate it.” Now either Clueless or his harpy, are really, really into pornography or they don’t have very much vision for the future AND don’t know how to articulate it.

Remember way back in 2000 when Bush clandestinely made the claims that he was a “Manchurian Candidate” traitor or mentally unstable from his North Vietnam POW days? McCain claims that he was disgusted and sickened by these attacks. Now he has employed the EXACT SAME attackers to attack for him. I guess when Cindy said that “John would rather lose an election rather than go negative” she was obviously still on the Percocet or she doesn’t understand that her husband would rather sell out the country in order to gain the power of the presidency.

How far will this coward and his harpies (this now includes Cindy) go in order to secure the White house? Covertly getting shills to pull a serious Rove tactic and say that Obama is going to get a rapper to paint the White house black, or how Obama will name Al Sharpton as the secretary of state? But people who are making fun of his hunched shoulders and stooped look should be ashamed. I mean can’t they see that this is the crooked walk of shame?

He is not only a coward but he is totally unfit to serve as our president. McCain agreed with President Bush 90% of the time, but he agrees with his negative strategies for running a campaign 100%. What kind of self respecting person votes for such a back handed, flip flopping, hatred inciting liar?

11 Comments

Filed under Racism

McCain Goes From Country First To Gutter First

Poor McCain and Palin are so desperate that they are now stooping to bringing up Bill Ayers who they claim is a terrorist. He is a terrorist who has not served a day in jail for any actions and is now a professor and NOT in jail. Maybe he is that terrorist that they claim he is, I am not here to address that one way or another. I am not going to get into the actions this man did while Obama was about eight years old.

They say this goes to judgment. Well I do want to talk about judgment. Let’s talk about the Keating five. Isn’t that a show of judgment or should we NOT look into the past, or at least not into the past of John McCain. He may not have been convicted but he was definitely reprimanded for showing poor judgment.

Not only did it show poor judgment but his direct words were “I have done this kind of thing many, many times,” and said the Lincoln case was like “helping the little lady who didn’t get her Social Security.” He admits he has done this many, many times, doesn’t this go to continued bad judgment.

So McCain has evidence that Ayers gave Obama a whopping two hundred dollars for his earlier campaign. Does this overshadow the fact that McCain got not only one hundred twelve thousand dollars in contributions? In addition according to The Arizona Republic and The New York Times, McCain’s wife Cindy McCain and her father Jim Hensley had invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators.

McCain, his family, and their baby-sitter had made nine trips at Keating’s expense, sometimes aboard Keating’s jet. Three of the trips were made during vacations to Keating’s opulent Bahamas retreat at Cat Cay. McCain did not pay Keating (in the amount of $13,433) for some of the trips until years after they were taken, when he learned that Keating was in trouble over Lincoln.

Sure McCain washed his hands of Keating AFTER the criminal investigation started. But if I am involved in a burglary all the way until there is a criminal investigation does this somehow negate my actions in the crime which occurred? Of course not, but for McCain it seems it did. Not only this McCain and Keating were personal friends after first meeting in 1981, and McCain was also the closest socially to Keating of the five senators. And we are supposed to fault Barack for something that some dude did when Barack was eight, RIGHT I GET IT.

How about someone telling me if Barack sitting on a board with Ayers ever injured anyone in anyway? How much did Obama knowing Ayers hurt the American people? Not what Ayers did long before he met Obama, but what harm did the two of them knowing each other cause the American people? Well McCain being pals with Keating more than 21,000 majority elderly investors lost their life savings to the tune of about $285 million. Not to mention that this relationship caused damage to the taxpayers of America 2 billion dollars.

This scandal was just a part of the U.S. Savings and Loan crisis of the 1980s and early 1990s was the failure of 747 Savings & Loans in the United States. The ultimate cost of the crisis is estimated to have totaled around $160.1 billion, about $124.6 billion of which was directly paid for by the U.S. taxpayer. John McCain was right in the middle of it in the 80’s and 90’s, so should we be surprised that his bad judgment of being the “deregulator” as he has referred to himself, has put him right in the middle of this debacle right now?

The things that people do when they are desperate liars can be seen as despicable but this goes far beyond that. It has implications that could sink McCain and Palin as they start to ride that fine line of US vs. them when referring to their view of America vs. Obama’s. It might even begin to look awful racial.

But like I said when you are desperate and losing you will pull out any card you feel will help revive your failing campaign. Whether that be “the race card” or the “Obama is the terrorist card,” they are all too eager in hoping that either will push you over the top. Except what you better hope is that this line of attack doesn’t push you and your campaign over the line as well as making you look like a bigger fool than you already are.

Sarah Palin being the silly ignorant un-Vice Presidential person that she is wants to play this childlike game of one being guilty by association I will be forced to do more posts on John McCain and herself about their shady associations.  Maybe the next post will be on the anti semitic and unashamedly racist organization for which John McCain served on its board called the U.S. Council For Freedom.

2 Comments

Filed under American society, Racism

Is Folksy Another Way To Say Liar?

I think Sarah Palin actually stayed on her feet during the debate, denying any of the Democrats the fun and joy of watching her once again fall on her face as she did in the company of Charlie Gibson, Katie Couric and some college student outside of the cheese steak sandwich shop. Yet, she did do her job by being able to string sentences together in a way that was coherent, this time. But is that really the criteria by which we judge our Vice Presidential candidates? This is as if being able to coherently string together sentences makes you qualified to be at the head of our government. How pathetic.

So I am wondering if the truth is just something that Palin just doesn’t quite understand. It is interesting to say the least that she continues her barrage of lies while seemingly being given a pass. She is running with the same old Bush tactics of tell a lie enough times and people will be stupid enough to believe it. She and McCain tout that they are nothing like the Bush administration and plan to bring change, yet I can’t help but notice that they sure follow Bush’s lead when debating and running a campaign. So let’s have a look at some of these interesting lies that she fails to stop saying even after being called on them.

Palin says that she is a serious Washington outsider because she is someone who is just not used to the way that things operate when “you voted for the war then turn around and oppose it.” Palin, do you mean the same way that you supported the bridge to nowhere before ya’ didn’t? Remember that thing you said um what was it again, oh yeah, “thanks but no thanks to that bridge to nowhere.” Remember you said all those big words AFTER saying that Alaska should build up its infrastructure while your representatives had the pull and power to get you all funds to do so.

She keeps talking about how she was such a tax relief advocate saying that she lowered taxes each year she was the Mayor of Wasilla. Well, if you mean you lowered taxes by raising them, then yep you betcha’. Sarah Palin successfully pushed for a referendum to raise local sales taxes to pay for a multi-use sports complex. In a memo CBS got from the Wasilla City Hall, Palin said it made sense to raise taxes because there was strong support for the hockey rink, the private sector had failed to step in and because it would be good to use government money to prevent social problems instead of spending money to try and fix them. I guess she did lowered taxes by raising them first. You know thanks but no thanks to higher taxes.

There you go again Sarah, claiming that you are building the largest natural gas pipeline in North America. For one thing the pipeline doesn’t even have approval yet so I wouldn’t really call that “building.” I don’t think I am mistaken or playing with semantics when I say that building implies that there are people hammering and welding or whatever it takes to BUILD a pipeline. I don’t know about the rest of you but I am seeing that those who think this lady is somehow smart or qualified are certifiably crazy or are seriously lacking in brain cells.

She claims that McClellan didn’t say that a surge wouldn’t work in Afghanistan. Who in the hell is McClellan, unless she is talking about Scott McClellan, but I don’t think that he has any knowledge of what will or won’t work in Afghanistan. I guess a General named McKiernan is a little like an ex-White House Press Secretary named Scott McClellan except that a General named David McKiernan has ACTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES IN AFGHANISTAN!

Is this lady kidding? But the truth actually is that after McCain John McCain said that “the same strategy” the surge implemented in Iraq is “going to have to be employed in Afghanistan.” General McKiernan not McClellan said emphatically that no Iraq-style “surge” of forces will end the conflict there (Afghanistan).

Obama is going to RAISE taxes Sarah loudly proclaims into the microphone AGAIN. Say it ain’t so Sarah! There you go lying again!  Say that with a wink, nod and a smile. Hasn’t this lie been repeatedly debunked? *Sigh* According to The Non-partisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, Senator Obama offers much larger tax breaks to low- and middle-income taxpayers and would increase taxes on high-income taxpayers. The largest tax cuts, as a share of income, would go to those at the bottom of the income distribution, while taxpayers with the highest income would see their taxes rise.

Yet in marked contrast, Senator McCain’s tax cuts would primarily benefit those with very high incomes, almost all of whom would receive large tax cuts that would, on average, raise their after-tax incomes by more than twice the average for all households. Many fewer households at the bottom of the income distribution would get tax cuts and those whose taxes fall would, on average, see their after-tax income rise much less.

Oh Sarah, you little liar you. Aren’t you so cute with your exaggerations, fabrications and quick witted cock and bull stories? Now I have to ask if this is what we are looking for. Another four years of the lies, the fear mongering, the cloak over the entire executive branch. I mean they aren’t really looking any different with the tactics they are using. Such as accusing people of “gotcha” questioning for just asking a candidate what they know.

Or how about employing a barrage of high powered lawyers in order to stall or otherwise hinder her little “troopergate” scandal. And they want to continue pretending they are running on the platform of change. Actually I guess you can say they are running on change, the only change being the names of the White house players. Except for that everything is looking pretty much the same.

Leave a comment

Filed under Rant, Social Issues, Thoughts

Would Blacks Vote For Obama If He Were White?

I am getting so tired and so fed up with these moronic idiots who constantly ask “would (insert name of black person here) be voting for Obama if he were white?” Now this is what I call a truly asinine question. Please white people; tell me a DEMOCRAT who didn’t get the majority of the black vote? There haven’t been any democrats in recent history who have NOT gotten the majority of the black vote.

In fact the black vote is pretty much consistently 90% FOR the democrats. So why would it be a surprise to anyone that this same number is supporting Obama now? The question is would (insert white person here) be voting for McCain if he were a black man? Now that is a question I would love to here the answer to. What if both candidates were black, who would people vote for? That is a fairer question since we already know that blacks would probably vote for a democrat even if he or she was a morlock. Due to the fact being that the Democrats “seem” to be the lesser of the two evils we are stuck with picking from.

Black people were more than prepared to vote for white lady Hillary Clinton if she had won the nomination. They wouldn’t have run to McCain and the Republican’s just because their candidate didn’t get the nomination. Blacks aren’t anything if they aren’t faithful and loyal. Yet, you can’t really say the same thing about the white Hillary supporters or a lot of the white democrats in general. But if this game continues these white Democrats who are being so flaky just might run the black vote off, hopefully to one of the independent parties.

Think about it blacks have had to vote for one white dude or another since being able to vote so if Obama was white it wouldn’t make one damn bit of difference, he is still a democrat. Now if let’s say Clarence Thomas were to run for president under the Republican ticket, I highly doubt that he would get more than ten to fifteen percent of the black vote. That would include the blacks who already vote Republican and then the idiots who would vote for him due to his race. But most blacks are just as wary about blacks who would do us harm politically as we are a white person who would do us wrong.

Now the question of whether whites would vote for a black McCain is pretty obvious. If McCain were black and Obama were white it would be a no brainer that Obama would be winning by a landslide right now. It is just pathetic that people won’t admit as much. The question is why white Democrats are so reluctant to support their beloved party all of a sudden. We all know that the majority of people vote along political lines NOT based solely on the person running. And yet Mr. McGoo is still hanging in tight with an opponent who is obviously better suited to the position than him.

These fools say that blacks are racist to vote overwhelmingly for the Democrat when they always have look at how we overwhelmingly supported Bill Clinton for two terms. It is a case of “look blacks are racist for supporting Obama the Democrat so we aren’t so bad for being racist in our supporting Mcfarce.” So what is the real motive behind trying to paint the black population as racists for supporting a group of people they would have supporting regardless who was the candidate? Is it to justify their backwards racism or is it out just out of their sheer stupidity? You be the judge.

35 Comments

Filed under African American, Black community, Black Culture, Black People, Minorities, Racism